Introduction/review for The Cutting Room, Episode 3
By Joseph Christiana

The eponymous real life killer of our first film needs no introduction. His name is uttered on
school yard playgrounds with an ominous reverence reserved for angry gods. In kitchens his
name falls from the mouths of mothers with a fear masked as disgust. Around water coolers
and on internet fan boards, he's discussed in tones of false bravado and irreverence that
surely belies a nervous uncertainty. Indeed, the name DAHMER has come to embody the
latent monstrosities we secretly believe is inherent in us all. He is our darkest fear, our most
repressed desires; he is our bogey man.

Directed by David Jacobsen, DAHMER is a 2002 film that takes a cursory look into the life of
one of America's most infamous killers. On the surface Jeffrey Dahmer is every serial killer
cliché: he's unassuming, quiet and disappears into the fabric of humanity. He has a menial job
at a chocolate factory and generally keeps to himself. He's the kind of guy you might find at a
comic book convention or playing dungeons and dragons. But Dahmer, of course, has a
hobby of much different nature: He lures attractive young men up to his apartment, doses
them, dismembers them, screws them, and eats them. Not necessarily in that order.

After witnessing a tone setting kidnapping and killing, which nearly leads to Dahmer's demise,
we move swiftly into another kidnapping. Dahmer invites an attractive young man up to his
apartment for beers and romance. During this date, which will prove to be his last, Dahmer
reminisces about the circumstances leading up to his first killing, when he picked up a young
wrestler as a high school student living with his parents. Jacobsen intercuts past and present,
showing us many disturbing details which have now become legendary.

Legendary and disturbing, yes, but with more restraint than I had anticipated. Because of
Dahmer's reputation preceding the film, I felt a sense of dread for what I was about to see. But
although there are certainly gruesome and graphic moments, Jacobsen doesn't resort to the
splatter fest a lesser director would have reveled in. Despite that restraint, or maybe because
of it, he was able to sustain dread and horror throughout. A commendable display of

Now, the trouble with any biopic is that the audience invariably knows the ending before they
even enter the theater. So the challenge for a filmmaker is not to surprise an audience by what
happens to them at the end of their plight, but rather to get us to empathize with them as they
endure the trials and tribulations of their lives. Empathy is especially problematic with serial
killer biopics for obvious reasons.

I realized that the reason so many serial killer films centers on an investigation is because the
investigator provides a character we can empathize with. Without them we'd generally stand in
judgment of the main character, which usually means we stand apart from the film, which
generally takes us right out of the drama.

There's no investigation in DAHMER, and no good guys to side with. Jacobsen walks a fine
line. He flirts dangerously close to asking us to sympathize with the monster he presents. In
fact, there's a scene where Dahmer cries uncontrollably after committing his first murder, and
I'm curious, guys, were you feeling vindicated because this monster felt terrible about what
he'd done… or were you feeling bad for him, just a little, because he couldn't help what he was.
Hey! This is the
horror archives
Click here for the
current site of The
Cutting Room.